Which table of Arizona 🏀 greats would you pick to sit with?

Started by WILD, August 09, 2019, 02:38:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jumpinjohnny

Quote from: Liquidated on August 10, 2019, 09:00:31 AM
Any table but #10...can't stand that jerk.  ::)

The REAL question is who wins the 3 on 3 Tournament?

ROUND I

2 beats 1
4 beats 3
5 beats 6 (in quadruple overtime)
7 beats 8 
9 beats 10 (by 50 points EPIC slaughter due primarily to coaching). But then the NCAA investigates and they are served a 2 game suspension by the NCAA for the coach of team 10 guy who was trying to pay the center on team 9 to shave points. He receives a lifetime show-cause and team 10 has to forfeit the loss. Team 9's center is also served a suspension and bolts for the NBA. So the remaining players of 9 and 10 combine.

ROUND II

2 beats 4
5 beats 7 (in an upset)
Team 9 is unable to play due to NCAA violations.

ROUND III

5 beats 2 (in a another upset and is labelled by the media the 'Cinderella' team of the tournament).
9 is serving their second game suspension.


ROUND IV (CHAMPIONSHIP)

Cinderella gets crushed - proving that cheaters always win.
Coached by Olson, team 9 comes back with a vengeance. Other than brief period of pouting by Salim, he goes off and hits 11 3 pointers bettered only by Arenas' 12 3 pointers and Jefferson dominates with 17 rebounds, 8 blocks and the team combines for 19 steals.

Wouldn't this be considered hijacking?


Liquidated

QuoteWouldn't this be considered hijacking?


No. It would be considered black humor. From Dictionary.com:

noun
a form of humor that regards human suffering as absurd rather than pitiable, or that considers human existence as ironic and pointless but somehow comic.
"How does this guy still have his job?! That makes no sense...the world is getting nuked around him and Sean Miller is still there..."  - Mark Titus


BDU Recent Topics

BearDownU - Menu