Which table of Arizona 🏀 greats would you pick to sit with? (This originally came from http://twitter.com/ArizonaNBA (http://twitter.com/ArizonaNBA))
(https://i.ibb.co/gWtHnft/IMG-20190809-142612.jpg)
#9 would be awesome just for Lute's presence and the humor from Ayton and RJ. #10 would be the most interesting by far...would be awesome to hear Salim and Gilbert's wild stories and watch Sean try to not react with a Miller-face.
There are some great tables but I would go with #6. Primary reason is Sean Elliott my favorite Wildcat of all time. Jason Gardner was a heck of a point guard and I think over time we will appreciate Allonzo Trier more. Hard to turn down other tables as they all have some fantastic Cats at them
2
6
9
8
5
7
The field
#7
Channing is one of the funniest guys I've ever met. Luke is a character and Gordon is a bonus.
Plenty of tables to sit at but that one would be the most entertaining (unless you're liquidated at table 10).
Going with number 5 with nick laurie an Kerr I like all those guys an they were really good players.
I'm going Table #5.
As an Arizona fan, and Chicago Bulls fan, this is my table.
And NJ is one of my favorite Miller era players for several reasons.
8 or Tolbert all by himself....dude is nuts
Since I've only really experienced the Miller era it would be between table 2 and 5, and easily my 4 favorite Wildcats. Though table 9 and the GOAT himself would be hard to pass up.
Any table but #10...can't stand that jerk. ::)
The REAL question is who wins the 3 on 3 Tournament?
ROUND I
2 beats 1
4 beats 3
5 beats 6 (in quadruple overtime)
7 beats 8
9 beats 10 (by 50 points EPIC slaughter due primarily to coaching). But then the NCAA investigates and they are served a 2 game suspension by the NCAA for the coach of team 10 guy who was trying to pay the center on team 9 to shave points. He receives a lifetime show-cause and team 10 has to forfeit the loss. Team 9's center is also served a suspension and bolts for the NBA. So the remaining players of 9 and 10 combine.
ROUND II
2 beats 4
5 beats 7 (in an upset)
Team 9 is unable to play due to NCAA violations.
ROUND III
5 beats 2 (in a another upset and is labelled by the media the 'Cinderella' team of the tournament).
9 is serving their second game suspension.
ROUND IV (CHAMPIONSHIP)
Cinderella gets crushed - proving that cheaters always win.
Coached by Olson, team 9 comes back with a vengeance. Other than brief period of pouting by Salim, he goes off and hits 11 3 pointers bettered only by Arenas' 12 3 pointers and Jefferson dominates with 17 rebounds, 8 blocks and the team combines for 19 steals.
Quote from: Liquidated on August 10, 2019, 09:00:31 AM
Any table but #10...can't stand that jerk. ::)
The REAL question is who wins the 3 on 3 Tournament?
ROUND I
2 beats 1
4 beats 3
5 beats 6 (in quadruple overtime)
7 beats 8
9 beats 10 (by 50 points EPIC slaughter due primarily to coaching). But then the NCAA investigates and they are served a 2 game suspension by the NCAA for the coach of team 10 guy who was trying to pay the center on team 9 to shave points. He receives a lifetime show-cause and team 10 has to forfeit the loss. Team 9's center is also served a suspension and bolts for the NBA. So the remaining players of 9 and 10 combine.
ROUND II
2 beats 4
5 beats 7 (in an upset)
Team 9 is unable to play due to NCAA violations.
ROUND III
5 beats 2 (in a another upset and is labelled by the media the 'Cinderella' team of the tournament).
9 is serving their second game suspension.
ROUND IV (CHAMPIONSHIP)
Cinderella gets crushed - proving that cheaters always win.
Coached by Olson, team 9 comes back with a vengeance. Other than brief period of pouting by Salim, he goes off and hits 11 3 pointers bettered only by Arenas' 12 3 pointers and Jefferson dominates with 17 rebounds, 8 blocks and the team combines for 19 steals.
Wouldn't this be considered hijacking?
2, 9, 7 in that order.
QuoteWouldn't this be considered hijacking?
No. It would be considered black humor. From Dictionary.com:
noun
a form of humor that regards human suffering as absurd rather than pitiable, or that considers human existence as ironic and pointless but somehow comic.